Description review

General Counsel

micro1 · Remote · back to the listing

HR standards

69/100

needs work

Title ↔ description

49/100

poor

Reads as

Legal Counsel

96% confident

What this role officially is

corporate lawyer — ESCO, the EU occupation classification

Corporate lawyers provide legal consulting services and representation to corporations and organisations. They give advice on matters relating to taxes, legal rights and patents, international trade, trademarks, and legal financial issues arising from operating a business.

Also known as: business solicitor, corporate attorney, patent lawyer, trademark lawyer, corporation lawyer, intellectual property lawyer

How others title the same work

Large employers

  • Legal Counsel - Regulatory Compliance, Product and Privacy Canonical
  • Legal Counsel - Regulatory Compliance, Product and Privacy Canonical Ltd.
  • Commercial Legal Counsel GitLab
  • Senior Commercial Counsel, APJ GitLab
  • Product Counsel (Crypto/Bridge) Stripe

Startups

  • Head of Legal & Compliance Chariot
  • Startup Counsel Dover

The listing, marked up

Nothing in the wording of this listing tripped a check. The scores above still judge how complete and coherent it is.

Role Title: General Counsel

Role Type: Contractor

Location: Remote

Job Summary:We are seeking seasoned in-house General Counsels for a part-time role at the forefront of legal AI. This opportunity is for elite lawyers who want to help shape how advanced AI is trained, evaluated, and applied in real-world legal work, especially those who have deep experience with drafting, reviewing, negotiating, and redlining within the tech field.

In this role, you will review, assess, and contribute to contract redlining workflows used to train and evaluate state-of-the-art AI models. Your work will directly improve how these systems identify risk and interpret contract language to create tools with improved precision and legal judgment.

Key Responsibilities:

• Perform simulated contract negotiations and redlining exercises.

• Review and assess AI responses to contract scenarios, providing expert feedback to improve model performance and output precision.

• Create objective evaluation frameworks and grading criteria to assess AI performance on contract tasks with rigor and consistency.

• Collaborate with product and research teams to refine data, guidelines, and best practices for AI-driven contract review solutions.

Required Skills and Qualifications:

• Minimum of 3 years of in-house experience focused on technology transactions, particularly negotiating MSAs, NDAs, and DPAs.

• Exceptional written and verbal communication skills with meticulous attention to detail.

• Strong analytical capabilities and ability to translate legal expertise into actionable feedback for AI systems.

• Demonstrated commitment to innovation at the intersection of law and technology.

• Experience working with cross-disciplinary teams in fast-paced environments.

Preferred Qualifications:

• Prior exposure to AI, legal tech, or training initiatives.

Why Join:

• This is an opportunity to work at the intersection of law and technology.

• You will help define how AI is developed for a new generation of legal practitioners.

• You will apply your experience in a high-impact research environment.

Compensation Structure:

Compensation is task-based, meaning experts are paid per completed task that meets the project specifications. The average handling time (AHT) is approximately 3.5 hours per task, and the effective hourly rate will depend on the number of tasks completed and successfully signed off.

Originally posted on Himalayas

How this was produced

Highlights are found by rule, not by a model: each one is a phrase matched at a known position, and every note is a template we wrote. The two scores come from a typed-decision model (Jev) that reads the listing against the official role definition and real listings for the same role, and returns probabilities rather than prose — it never writes any of the words on this page, and never chooses what to highlight.

Deterministic penalty applied to the HR score: 0 points (from 69 before penalties). Reviewed 21 Sep 2026.