Description review

Product Manager, Risk and Fraud

HitPay · Remote · back to the listing

HR standards

54/100

needs work

Title ↔ description

89/100

strong

Reads as

Product Manager

100% confident

What this role officially is

ICT product manager — ESCO, the EU occupation classification

ICT product managers analyse and define current and target status for ICT products, services or solutions. They estimate the cost effectiveness, points of risk, opportunities, strengths and weaknesses of products or services provided. ICT product managers create structured plans and establish time scales and milestones, ensuring optimisation of activities and resources.

Also known as: IT product manager, IT products manager, ICT product managers, ICT products manager, ICT products managers

How others title the same work

Large employers

  • Staff Product Manager, Search Experiences Mozilla
  • Missionforce - Senior Product Manager, Agentforce Public Sector Salesforce
  • Product Lead, Connect Stripe
  • Product Manager - Compliance, Bridge Stripe
  • Product Manager, Ecosystem Risk Stripe

Startups

  • Technical Product Manager Careforce
  • Product Manager Agave
  • Product Manager AlgoTest
  • Product Manager Aqua
  • Product Manager Artisan

What the listing never says

  • 35 bullet points. Long requirement lists deter qualified candidates, who read them as hard gates. Scope clarity
  • No pay range published. Candidates cannot tell whether applying is worth their time. Pay transparency

The listing, marked up

Nothing in the wording of this listing tripped a check. The scores above still judge how complete and coherent it is.

================================================================================

ABOUT HITPAY

================================================================================

HitPay is the payments and business operations platform for small and medium

businesses across Southeast Asia and beyond. We process card, e-wallet, bank

transfer, PayNow, QR and card-present payments for tens of thousands of

merchants across Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, Hong Kong, Australia and

the United States — through a single onboarding flow, a single dashboard, and a

single API.

Payments is a regulated business. We hold a Major Payment Institution licence

from the Monetary Authority of Singapore and operate under a spread of local

regimes, scheme rules and partner-bank obligations. Today, most of our risk,

fraud and AML capability exists to keep us safe. We believe a meaningful share

of it should also be a product our merchants pay for.

That is the job.

================================================================================

THE ROLE

================================================================================

You will own risk, fraud and compliance as a product line — not as a cost

centre. You are being hired to design, build and ship products that reduce loss,

shorten onboarding, and generate revenue: fraud screening our merchants opt into,

chargeback and dispute tooling they will pay for, underwriting and KYB

capabilities we can sell or embed, monitoring and reporting our larger merchants

and platform partners need in order to grow on us.

This is a builder's role with a regulator's discipline. You will spend your week

between a compliance officer, a backend engineer and a merchant, and you will be

the person who can hold all three conversations without a translator.

================================================================================

WHAT YOU WILL OWN

================================================================================

Revenue products

•
Define, price and ship monetisable risk and fraud products: fraud scoring

and screening tiers, chargeback protection and representment tooling,

dispute automation, merchant-facing risk dashboards, KYB / identity

verification as a paid capability, and risk services for platform and

marketplace partners.

•
Build the commercial case: attach rate, pricing model, loss economics,

payback. Own the P&L logic of what you ship, not just the roadmap.

•
Work with Sales and Partnerships to take these products to market — you will

be in customer calls, and you will lose some of them and learn why.

Compliance and risk engineering

•
Own the product surface of transaction monitoring, sanctions and PEP

screening, merchant onboarding and KYB, prohibited-industry and MCC policy

enforcement, and chargeback and fraud loss controls.

•
Turn regulatory obligations and internal policy into shipped system

behaviour: rules, thresholds, queues, audit trails, evidence packs,

escalation paths and reporting.

•
Drive rule tuning and alert quality as a product metric. False positive

rate, analyst minutes per alert and precision at the top of the queue are

yours to move.

•
Evaluate, integrate and manage third-party vendors — fraud engines,

screening providers, device intelligence, identity — including build vs.

buy calls and commercial negotiation support.

Stakeholder leadership

•
Be the trusted counterpart to the Compliance and MLRO function. You will not

ship around them, and they will not be surprised by what you ship.

•
Handle regulator, partner-bank and scheme-facing product questions:

respond to information requests, explain control design, and evidence that

the system does what the policy says it does.

•
Translate between compliance intent and engineering implementation in both

directions, and say plainly when a control cannot be built the way it was

written.

================================================================================

WHAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR

================================================================================

Non-negotiable

•
5+ years in product management, with meaningful time spent on compliance,

risk or fraud engineering INSIDE a payments company — a PSP, acquirer,

payment facilitator, card issuer, remittance provider, digital bank,

marketplace payments team or fraud/RegTech vendor. Adjacent fintech

experience without payments exposure is not a substitute.

•
Demonstrated ownership of systems that a regulator, auditor or scheme has

actually examined. You should be able to describe a control you designed and

how it held up under scrutiny.

•
Working fluency in the regulation, not a reading knowledge: AML/CFT

obligations and the MAS Payment Services Act notices, or an equivalent

regime you have operated under (BNM, BSP, AUSTRAC, FinCEN, FCA). CDD/KYB,

ongoing monitoring, STR/SAR workflow, sanctions screening, record keeping.

•
Card scheme and network risk programmes: Visa VAMP / VDMP, Mastercard

Excessive Fraud and Chargeback programmes, dispute lifecycle and

representment, 3-D Secure and SCA, PCI DSS scope.

•
Fluency with data. You can write your own SQL, interrogate a warehouse, size

a rule's impact before proposing it, and refuse a metric that does not hold

up.

•
A track record of working with compliance stakeholders as partners — people

whose job is to say no — and shipping anyway, without cutting corners.

Strong signals

•
You have taken a risk or fraud capability to market as a paid product, not

just an internal tool.

•
Southeast Asian market experience, particularly Singapore, Malaysia or the

Philippines, and comfort with the local payment rails.

•
Hands-on with fraud and screening platforms (Forter, Sift, Sardine,

Ravelin, ComplyAdvantage, Flagright, Unit21 or similar) as an operator, not

a buyer on a slide.

•
You can prototype. You use AI tooling to move faster and you write enough

code to be dangerous and useful.

•
Experience with merchant underwriting and portfolio risk at a payment

facilitator, including reserves, exposure and offboarding decisions.

How you work

•
You go find the root cause. You do not ship a workaround and call it done.

•
You are opinionated and you show your reasoning, and you change your mind

when the data says so.

•
You write clearly. Specs, policy mappings and post-incident write-ups are

part of the job, not an overhead.

•
You are comfortable being the person accountable when a control fails.

================================================================================

WHAT SUCCESS LOOKS LIKE

================================================================================

First 90 days

•
You know our risk stack end to end: what runs, what is manual, what is

theatre, and where the real losses are coming from.

•
You have a documented view of our fraud and chargeback loss economics by

market and by provider, and you have named the top three fixable causes.

•
You have shipped at least one improvement to alert quality or onboarding

friction that Compliance and Ops can feel.

First 12 months

•
At least one risk or fraud product is live, priced, and generating revenue

with a defensible attach rate.

•
Fraud and chargeback loss as a share of processed volume is down, and you

can attribute the movement.

•
Compliance review and onboarding turnaround times are materially shorter

without a loosening of standards.

•
Our monitoring and screening coverage stands up to a partner-bank or

regulator review without a scramble.

================================================================================

WHY THIS ROLE

================================================================================

•
Real ownership. This is a product line, not a backlog. You will set the

strategy and be accountable for the outcome.

•
Small team, direct access. You will work with the founders. Decisions take

days, not quarters.

•
The problems are genuine. Multi-market regulation, live fraud, real money,

real merchants — and a product surface that almost nobody in this region has

built properly yet.

How this was produced

Highlights are found by rule, not by a model: each one is a phrase matched at a known position, and every note is a template we wrote. The two scores come from a typed-decision model (Jev) that reads the listing against the official role definition and real listings for the same role, and returns probabilities rather than prose — it never writes any of the words on this page, and never chooses what to highlight.

Deterministic penalty applied to the HR score: 8 points (from 62 before penalties). Reviewed 21 Sep 2026.