Description review

Reporting Officer

University of Manchester · Manchester, United Kingdom · back to the listing

HR standards

22/100

poor

Title ↔ description

40/100

poor

Reads as

Unclear

no confident match

What the listing never says

  • No section describes what the person would actually do. Scope clarity
  • No pay range published. Candidates cannot tell whether applying is worth their time. Pay transparency
  • No location or timezone policy stated, so a candidate cannot tell where they may work from. Scope clarity

The listing, marked up

Nothing in the wording of this listing tripped a check. The scores above still judge how complete and coherent it is.

At the end of 2025, The University of Manchester launched Challenge Accepted, our first major fundraising and volunteering campaign. We are uniting alumni, donors, staff, students and partners to tackle some of the world’s toughest challenges and transform lives locally and globally.

How this was produced

Highlights are found by rule, not by a model: each one is a phrase matched at a known position, and every note is a template we wrote. The two scores come from a typed-decision model (Jev) that reads the listing against the official role definition and real listings for the same role, and returns probabilities rather than prose — it never writes any of the words on this page, and never chooses what to highlight.

Deterministic penalty applied to the HR score: 16 points (from 38 before penalties). Reviewed 23 Sep 2026.